Bill suggests removing part of marijuana DUI tests

Some Nevada lawmakers say medical marijuana patients shouldn't be deemed impaired when driving just because they have small amounts of marijuana in their system.

Click here to read the full story.

Post a Comment

kdavis52 - 5/9/2013 2:39 PM
0 Votes
Washington State Patrol deemed/proved that a chronic/medicinal user is a safer driver than an occasional party user is. The chronic user doesn't over smoke unless pushed to do so by testing by officials like the State Patrol.

danco - 5/9/2013 8:12 AM
1 Vote
It's the same thing as alcohol and other prescription drugs: if you're impaired, you're going to get a DUI. If you're a medical marijuana user and you're impaired, don't drive, get a designated driver. If you only have a low-level of THC in your system and it's not impairing you, then drive safely, obey the traffic laws, and you won't even get pulled over! Non-issue! Or, better yet, decriminalize pot altogether, and get rid of the low-level THC penalty for everyone!

happynvchick84 - 5/9/2013 2:37 AM
1 Vote
They actually did a test on the Discovery Channel where they took regular marijuana users drive on a closed course with a police officer as a passenger. They were given certain tasks to do while driving and were presented with various random objects. The test proved that they were not only cautious drivers after smoking, but they drove better 'under the influence of marijuana' than they did sober. I think people are very quick to judge those who smoke weed. It should be treated just the same as alcohol. If a cop pulls you over for driving in an unsafe manner and a field sobriety tests is necessary, thats one thing. Nevada Medical Marijuana users have that listed on their drivers license so any cop who sees this can say that the driver was under the influence. Even if that person hadnt smoked yet that day, its still in their system and it still counts as a DUI. Which is not fair. You're telling them that it's okay to use marijuana because their doctor prescribes it to them, but you might as well take their right to drive away from them at the same time, because either way it will remain in their system for a long period of time.

Kramer - 5/8/2013 4:57 PM
0 Votes
we should just immunize the med marijuana crowd they're 'floaters' anyway

Kramer - 5/8/2013 4:56 PM
0 Votes
timzrage's comment, while generally acceptable, gets confusing at the end and further belies the local DA's tendency to go after the "trace amount" or ingested matter, rather than truth, justice, or Galletti Way.

timzrage - 5/8/2013 4:19 PM
1 Vote
If someone has a small amount of THC in the system they should not be deemed impaired, just as someone who has a very small amount of alcohol isn't considered impaired. HOWEVER, if the person that has a trace amount of THC or alcohol, AND makes an impaired type move in their vehicle (giving the officer reason to pull the person over in the first place), then yes, even a trace of alcohol or marijuana should be given a DUI roadside test to test for impairment.

Featured Segments/Shows

All content © Copyright 2015 Intermountain West Communications, LLC. All Rights Reserved. For more information on this site, please read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
You may also view our Sitemap

Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.